[Science programs/Swish Files/AKCL.html]
 

Action Research  by Joe Crawley           referenced  "Reading to Graduate" Steven Jantzen – “ I read it but I can’t Get It” Eric Jensen “The learning Brain” , Jeffrey D Wilhem “ Improving Comprehensions With Think –Aloud Str                                                                                 

     

 

 

 

 

 

Materials:

Reading Check:  questions to determine what students are thinking and doing during their reading    PDF

Solution:  provides the answers and  applicability to the thesis   PDF

Analysis Matrix:  This matrix  enables the questions and answers to be correlated with the thesis. PDF

Strategies This overview of reading strategies came from Reading to Graduate by Steve Jantzen PDF

Home

Student Data  : Each student was positive and enthusiastic about the program .  Each felt a sense of relief that the problem of their reading had been  found . They also felt positive that they would pass the FCAT and that their ability to comprehend had improved.

  • Student 1(high)

    • initial analysis --4 FCAT scores ranged from 241 to 290

    • analysis of reading check results--Overcoming boredom was the highest area of concern  See student 1 analysis matrix. We emphasized and worked with the strategies that applied to the  area of concern.  See strategies hand out.

    • student outcome --FCAT results will be posted 20 May

  • Student 2( medium)

    • initial analysis --4 FCAT scores ranged from 100 to 288

    • analysis of reading check results Adjusting to an author's style was the highest area of concern  See student 2 analysis matrix. We emphasized and worked with the strategy that applied to the  area of concern.  See strategies hand out.

    • student outcome--FCAT results will be posted 20 May

  • Student 3 (Low)

    • initial analysis--4 FCAT scores ranged from 156 to 275

    • analysis of reading check results--Overcoming boredom and adjusting to an author's style were the highest areas of concern  See student 3 analysis matrix. We emphasized and worked with the strategies that applied to the  areas of concern.  See strategies hand out.

    • student outcome--FCAT results will be posted 20 May

Conclusions / Findings: 

  • Student 1(high)   Improved from a 290 to 325  (level 2 to level 3) He felt that being able to focus on strategies to conquer his boredom brought him through for the first time.   He was overjoyed.

  • Student 2 (medium) Improved from a 288 to 305.  The student had never received much instruction on different authors style.  The student felt much more comfortable recognizing each authors style.  Felt that It improved comprehension.

  • Student 3(low)  turned in a blank paper.  He knew that he would receive his diploma as a Special Ed Student and therefore felt he didn't have to try.

Recommendations:  The research suggests that further study and use with students is warranted.

 

 

 

 

 

 

     


 

 

.